Penilaian E-Servqual Terhadap Fasilitas E-Learning dengan Menggunakan Analisa Faktor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1097

Keywords:

E-Servqual, Electronic Services, Electronic Learning

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic that has occurred to date has made learning activities that are usually carried out face-to-face, switch to networks by utilizing e-learning media. The transfer of learning activities to e-learning media has advantages and disadvantages so that it needs to be evaluated. This evaluation is carried out to see to what extent the service quality of e-learning media is used in learning activities. One way to assess service quality is using the e-service quality method. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of e-learning services. The service quality assessment factors used in this study are tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The research method used in this research is quantitative method and the data collection period starts from August 2020 to February 2021. 174 students was participated in this study, with the largest proportion being semester 7 students. The instrument used has good validity with a KMO value of more than 0, 5 and is reliable with a Cronbach's alpha value of more than 0.6. The final results of the study can be concluded that five factors measuring the quality of electronic services can be used to measure the quality of electronic learning services and the most influential factor is the assurance factor.

Author Biography

Kristophorus Hadiono, Universitas Stikubank

Dosen tetap di Program Studi Sistem Informasi

References

L. Pham, Y. B. Limbu, T. K. Bui, H. T. Nguyen, and H. T. Pham, “Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3.

S. Ivanaj, G. B. Nganmini, and A. Antoine, “Measuring e-learners’ perceptions of service quality,” J. Organ. End User Comput., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 83–104, 2019, doi: 10.4018/JOEUC.2019040105.

X. Xie, “Factor analysis of e-learning services quality,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 139, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201713900112.

M. Ghosh, “Measuring electronic service quality in India using E-S-QUAL instrument,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 430–445, 2017.

Y. C. J. Wu, J. P. Shen, and C. L. Chang, “Electronic service quality of Facebook social commerce and collaborative learning,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 51, pp. 1395–1402, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.001.

A. A. Akbar and T. Djatmiko, “Pengaruh E-Service Quality Terhadap E-Customer Satisfaction Dan E-Customer Loyalty Pada Lazada.co.id,” e-Proceeding Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 142–150, 2016.

G. Bressolles and J. Nantel, “The measurement of electronic service quality: Improvements and application,” Int. J. E-bus. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2008, doi: 10.4018/jebr.2008070101.

J. Santos, “E-service quality: A model of virtual service quality dimensions,” Manag. Serv. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 233–246, 2003, doi: 10.1108/09604520310476490.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-21

Issue

Section

Articles