Priority Recommendations for Residential Road Improvement Using the SMART Analysis Method

Lilik Sumaryanti; Syaiful Nugraha; Lusia Lamalewa

doi:10.32736/sisfokom.v12i3.1738

Authors

Lilik Sumaryanti Department of Informatic Engineering, Universitas Musamus
Syaiful Nugraha Department of Informatic Engineering, Universitas Musamus
Lusia Lamalewa Department of Informatic Engineering, Universitas Musamus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v12i3.1738

Keywords:

Priorities, SMART, Decision Support Systems, Road

Abstract

Roads are infrastructure for organizing transportation, which are places for traffic to flow both for people and goods to reach destinations safely, securely, comfortably, quickly, smoothly, orderly, and efficiently, especially roads in residential areas. Setting priorities for the road improvement program is the responsibility of the Public Housing, Settlement Areas, and Land Affairs Office, which handles technical planning, development, arrangement, supervision, and control of development in residential areas. Recommendations for road proposals for the currently running improvement program, based on an assessment of their physical condition, are carried out by experts. This prioritization certainly takes a long time because experts have to compare the physical conditions of the roads one by one to make a decision. A decision support system is specifically designed for the decision-making process that can be applied in various aspects of the decision-making field. Recommendations for alternative roads in the road improvement program were analyzed using the SMART method to find alternatives with the highest preference value and the advantage that they can be used for all weighting techniques. Accuracy testing shows that the priority recommendation output presented by the application has an accuracy rate of 80%. This value is obtained by comparing the results of recommendations from experts.

References

Musthofa, “Analisa Kerusakan dan Perbaikan Jalan Aspal,” D’Teksi J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 13–24, 2019.

A. P. Regitha, N. Hidayat, and A. W. Widodo, “Rekomendasi Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan Dengan Metode AHP-SAW-TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kota Malang),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2960–2969, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

R. A. Pratama and W. Harianto, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE AHP-TOPSIS DALAM,” SMARTICS J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 78–93, 2021.

R. P. Sari and A. M. Alliandaw, “Sistem Penentuan Penerima Bidikmisi UNTAN Dengan Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2022, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v11i2.1420.

D. H. Alahmadi and A. A. Jamjoom, “Decision support system for handling control decisions and decision-maker related to supply chain,” J. Big Data, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00653-9.

H. Apriyansyah, “Literature Review of: Decision Support System: Organization, Human Resources and Knowledge Management,” Dinasti Int. J. Econ. Financ. Account., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136–148, 2022.

S. Daulay, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan Pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kabupaten Padang Lawas Menggunakan Metode Vikor,” JISTech (Journal Islam. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2020.

Y. E. Windarto, I. P. Windasari, and M. A. M. Arrozi, “Implementasi Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Untuk Penentuan Tempat Pembuangan Akhir,” J. Pengemb. Rekayasa dan Teknol., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 12, 2019, doi: 10.26623/jprt.v15i1.1484.

Y. Septiana, F. Nuraeni, and K. Anisa, “Decision Support System for The Program Indonesia Pintar Scholarship Using Simple Additive Weighting Method,” J. dan Penelit. Tek. Inform., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2311–2316, 2022, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11786.

A. Jayady et al., “Decision Support System with Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1933, no. 1, pp. 0–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012017.

L. Sumaryanti, T. K. Rahayu, A. Prayitno, and Salju, “Comparison study of SMART and AHP method for paddy fertilizer recommendation in decision support system,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 343, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012207.

M. Saputra and L. Bachtiar, “Analisis Penerimaan Karyawan Pada Pt. Srikandi Diamond Indah Motors Sampit Dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 312–319, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i3.1239.

Sukamto, Y. Andriyani, and D. Oktaviani, “Penerapan Metode VIKOR untuk Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 11, pp. 187–194, 2022.

Aulia Rizky Muhammad Hendrik Noor Asegaff, M Dedy Rosyadi, and Budi Ramadhani, “Implementation of the Smart Methods (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique) for Location Selection of Industrial Work Practice and Monitoring in Vocational School Students,” J. Teknol. Inf. Univ. Lambung Mangkurat, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2022, doi: 10.20527/jtiulm.v7i2.140.

T. S. Almulhim and I. Barahona, “Decision support system for ranking relevant indicators for reopening strategies following COVID-19 lockdowns,” J. Qual. Quant., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 463–491, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01129-3.

A. Nugraha, A. Widianto, M. Irfan, M. Nasar, and M. Lestandy, “Decision Support System for Community Housing Subsidy Recipients,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2020, doi: 10.22219/jtiumm.vol21.no1.104-114.

Pemerintah Repulik Indonesia, UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 38 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG JALAN. Indonesia, 2004, pp. 1–61. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.pu.go.id/internal/assets/assets/produk/UU/2014/10/UU38-2004.pdf

Pemerintah Repulbik Indonesian, PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 34 TAHUN 2006. Indonesia: https://jdihn.go.id/files/4/2006pp034.pdf, 2006, pp. 1–38. [Online]. Available: https://jdihn.go.id/files/4/2006pp034.pdf

M. Farkas-Kis, “Decision making in the shadow of mathematical education,” J. Decis. Syst., vol. 31, no. S1, pp. 168–180, 2022, doi: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2087417.

J. Peignot, A. Peneranda, and S. Amabile, “Strategic Decision Support Systems for Local Government: A Performance Management Issue? The Use of Information Systems on the Decision-making and Performance Management of Local Government,” Int. Bus. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 92–100, 2012, doi: 10.5539/ibr.v6n2p92.

L. Sumaryanti and N. Nurcholis, “Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method for Selection the Superior Cattle,” INTENSIF J. Ilm. Penelit. dan Penerapan Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 131–141, 2020, doi: 10.29407/intensif.v4i1.13863.

L. Sumaryanti, Nurcholis, and L. Lamalewa, “Aplication of Hybrid Method for Superior cattle selection using Decision Support System,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 328, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202132803003.

Supardi and D. Mahdiana, “Sistem Penerimaan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarcy Process ( AHP ) Dan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique ( SMART ),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 12, pp. 90–95, 2023.

M. Hisjam, N. Octyajati, W. Sutopo, and A. Ali, “A Decision Support System to Achieve Self-Sufficiency of Soybean (Case: Central Java Province, Indonesia),” J. Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 144–156, 2020, doi: 10.25077/josi.v19.n2.p144-156.2020.

W. Wahyudi, J. Santony, and G. W. Nurcahyo, “Akurasi Keputusan dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Sistim Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 2, no. 2017, pp. 9–14, 2020, doi: 10.37034/jsisfotek.v2i1.15.