Performance Analysis of Chicken Freshness classification using Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, and k-NN

Authors

  • Regina Vannya Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Sains & Teknologi
  • Arief Hermawan Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Sains & Teknologi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v12i3.1740

Keywords:

chicken classification, freshness level, color extraction, naïve bayes classifier, histogram

Abstract

Chicken is one of the staple foods that is widely enjoyed by all. To obtain the benefits of chicken meat, the level of freshness becomes one of the main keys. In general, the level of freshness of chicken meat is divided into two classes, namely fresh and non-fresh. The difference in the level of freshness can be seen from the color changes of each class. Spoiled chicken (chicken died yesterday) is one type of meat in the non-fresh group. The widespread sale of spoiled chicken meat among the public raises doubts about choosing chicken that is suitable and unsuitable for consumption. Therefore, chicken meat freshness classification is needed to facilitate the selection of chicken meat based on color characteristics. The use of Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm in categorizing fresh and non-fresh classes is done by calculating the probability value of each image channel input. This research was conducted to compare the Naive Bayes, decision tree, and K-NN algorithms in classifying chicken meat based on color characteristics. The results of the study showed that the Naive Bayes classifier algorithm was superior to the decision tree and K-NN algorithms with an accuracy rate of 75%, precision of 79%, and recall of 65%. It is known that 27 images were predicted correctly and 9 images were predicted incorrectly out of a total 36 data. The use of a histogram in this study aims to differentiate chicken meat images from non-meat during the testing process of the model using the Naive Bayes classifier algorithm.

Author Biographies

Regina Vannya, Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Sains & Teknologi

Departemen Sains & Teknologi, Mahasiswa

Arief Hermawan, Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Sains & Teknologi

Departemen Sains & Teknologi, Dosen

References

T. Sajekti, D. Supiyadi, and A. H. Saputro, “PENGOLAHAN DAGING AYAM FROZEN SEBAGAI PENINGKATAN PEMASARAN AYAM POTONG,” Jurnal Abdi Insani, vol. 9, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.29303/abdiinsani.v9i2.591.

A. Husein, A. Ramzi, N. I. Muzakki, and R. Hasanah, “Quameaty: Aplikasi Pendeteksi Kualitas Daging Ayam Mentah Berbasis Pengolahan Citra Menggunakan Model InceptionV3,” JTERA (Jurnal Teknologi Rekayasa), vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.31544/jtera.v7.i1.2022.107-114.

A. Syahadat, “Kualitas Mikrobiologi Daging Ayam Mati Kemarin ‘Tiren’ dan Ayam Segar Strain Cobb 500 Ditinjau dari Total Plate Count, Salmonella sp. dan Eschericia coli,” Αγαη, vol. 8, no. 5. p. 55, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/137566/

Alwi Musa Muzaiyin, “PERILAKU PEDAGANG UNGGAS DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ETIKA BISNIS ISLAM (The Behavior of Poultry Traders Viewed from Islamic Business Ethics Perspective),” Qawãnïn Journal of Economic Syaria Law, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–52, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.30762/qawanin.v5i1.2945.

V. P. Bintoro, B. Dwiloka, and D. A. Sofyan, “PERBANDINGAN DAGING AYAM SEGAR DAN DAGING AYAM BANGKA DENGAN MEMAKAI UJI FISIKO KIMIA DAN MIKROBIOLOGI (The Comparison of the Slaughtered and Nonslaughtered Chicken Meat Using Physico-chemical and Microbiological Test).”

H. Zhang, “The Optimality of Naive Bayes Naive Bayes and Augmented Naive Bayes,” Aa, vol. 1, no. 2, 2004.

M. Nasir, “Klasifikasi Citra Daging Ayam Dengan Menggunakan Metode K -Nearest Neighbor,” E-Jurnal.Pnl.Ac.Id, vol. 1, no. 1, 2017.

syaeful achmad, ilham fadilah muhammad, muftadi imam, and iskandar dadang, “Klasifikasi Citra Bunga Dahlia Berdasarkan Warna Menggunakan Metode Otsu Thresholding Dan Naïve Bayes,” sains komputer & Informatika, vol. 6, 2022.

S. N. Hidayah, H. I. Wahyuni, and S. Kismiyati, “Kualitas Kimia Daging Ayam Broiler dengan Suhu Pemeliharaan yang Berbeda,” Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Peternakan, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.31605/jstp.v1i1.443.

R. Indarti, “Pengaruh Pemilihan Daging Ayam terhadap Pembuatan Dim Sum di Restaurant Tang Palace Hotel JW Marriot Surabaya,” Tourism, hospitality and culinary journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018.

Y. Withasari, “Pengaruh Media Big Book Terhadap Kemampuan Mengklasifikasi Pada Anak Usia Dini,” NOURA: Jurnal Kajian Gender, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.32923/nou.v3i2.1046.

Annissa Widya Davita, “Mengenal Naive Bayes Sebagai Salah Satu Algoritma Data Science,” DQLAB.COM, 2022.

C. C. Aggarwal and C. X. Zhai, “A survey of text classification algorithms,” in Mining Text Data, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4_6.

J. Chaki and N. Dey, A Beginner’s Guide to Image Preprocessing Techniques. 2018. doi: 10.1201/9780429441134.

Maulana Fansyuri and O. Hariansyah, “Pengenalan Objek Bunga dengan Ekstraksi Fitur Warna dan Bentuk Menggunakan Metode Morfologi dan Naïve Bayes,” Jurnal Sistem dan Informatika (JSI), vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30864/jsi.v15i1.338.

F. Howedi and M. Mohd, “Text Classification for Authorship Attribution Using Naive Bayes Classifier with Limited Training Data,” Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-06

Issue

Section

Articles