Perbandingan Penggunaan SAW dan AHP untuk Penentuan Prioritas Maintenance Rusunawa Depok

Authors

  • Aditya Alif Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Ilham Rahmaditia Arlingga Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Ika Nur Suciati Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Bagus Priambodo Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.942

Keywords:

Maintenance priority, Decision Support System, SAW, AHP

Abstract

Low costing flats are subsidized by the local government, but until now, there are still many flats that do not have a good system to manage the facility. The obstacle faced by the current management is that there is no system that can give priority scale there is no system that can provide a fast and precise priority scale to determine facilities that need to be repaired immediately by the management based on the availability resource so fast which facilities need to be repaired as soon as possible. Such as determining the priority of repairs among damaged public toilets or repairing damaged garden chairs. In this study, we propose the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to determine priority maintenance for facilities in low-cost flats. The results of calculations using SAW are evaluated by comparing the results of calculations using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The experimental results show that the ranking results using the SAW method are better than the results of ranking using the AHP, furthermore using SAW is also more efficient because the complexity required in the calculation is simpler.

Author Biographies

Aditya Alif, Universitas Mercu Buana

Student

Ilham Rahmaditia Arlingga, Universitas Mercu Buana

Student

Ika Nur Suciati, Universitas Mercu Buana

Student

Bagus Priambodo, Universitas Mercu Buana

Lecturer

References

Frieyadie, “PENERAPAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHT (SAW) DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PROMOSI KENAIKAN JABATAN,” J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/227474-penerapan-metode-simple-additive-weight-4b140887.pdf.

F. Sonata, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) dengan Proses Fuzzifikasi dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 71–80, 2016.

T. B. Sunardi and D. Kriestanto, “Perbandingan AHP dan SAW Untuk Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik (Studi Kasus: STMIK AKAKOM Yogyakarta),” Semin. Ris. Teknol. Inf., p. 9, 2016.

M. Masri, “Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (PDAM Tirta Silaupiasa),” JET (Journal Electr. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/jet/article/view/187.

E. Ismanto and N. Effendi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” SATIN - Sains dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.33372/stn.v3i1.208.

A. Munthafa and H. Mubarok, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi,” J. Siliwangi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 192–201, 2017.

H. Situmorang, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Peserta Olimpiade Sains Tingkat Kabupaten Langkat Pada Madrasah Aliyah Negeri ( Man ) 2 Tanjung Pura Denganmenggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ),” J. TIMES, vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 24–30, 2015.

R. Umar, A. Fadlil, and Y. Yuminah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode AHP untuk Penilaian Kompetensi Soft Skill Karyawan,” Khazanah Inform. J. Ilmu Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 27, 2018, doi: 10.23917/khif.v4i1.5978.

F. Sholikhah, D. H. Satyareni, and C. S. Anugerah, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pelanggan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Bravo Supermarket Jombang,” Regist. J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 40, 2016, doi: 10.26594/r.v2i1.444.

L. A. Prasetyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Kombinasi Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Simple Additive Weigting (SAW),” STRING (Satuan Tulisan Ris. dan Inov. Teknol., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 130, 2018, doi: 10.30998/string.v3i2.3039.

D. R. Sari, A. P. Windarto, D. Hartama, and S. Solikhun, “Decision Support System for Thesis Graduation Recommendation Using AHP-TOPSIS Method,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.6.1.2018.1-6.

M. A. Sembiring, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Sebagai Strategi Pembinaan Kecerdasan Anak,” Jurteksi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2017, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v4i1.35.

S. A.M.Pebakirang, A. Sutrisno, and J. Neyland, “Penerapan Metode Ahp ( Analytical Hierarchy Process ) Untuk Pemilihan Supplier Suku Cadang Di,” J. Online Poros Tek. Mesin, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2017.

A. Setyawan, F. Y. Arini, and I. Akhlis, “Comparative Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method and Weighted Product Method to New Employee Recruitment Decision Support System (DSS) at PT. Warta Media Nusantara,” Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2017, doi: 10.15294/sji.v4i1.8458.

N. Hasanah and R. Priambodo, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prioritas Program Kerja Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ),” J. Cendikia, vol. 18, no. X, pp. 349–358, 2019.

T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008, doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(87)90016-8.

T. Herdi, A. Dores, and F. Masya, “SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING IN SELECTION OF CITIES PERFORMANCE OF NON SMOKING AREA AND TOBACCO ADVERTISEMENTS , PROMOTIONS AND SPONSORS BAN,” pp. 71–79, 2020.

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL CIPTA KARYA, “Permen PU nomor 24 tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Pemeliharaan Gedung,” p. 16, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-07

Issue

Section

Articles