Decision Support System for Ranking Active Waste Bank in Makassar City Using TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods
(1) Universitas Muslim Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muslim Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muslim Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
In the city of Makassar, there were initially around 1000 waste banks, but this number has decreased significantly, and by 2023 only 381 waste banks remain active. The decline in the number of waste banks is primarily due to the society's lack of knowledge regarding the utilization of waste banks. This research aims to rank active waste banks in Makassar using the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) technique. Two MCDM methods will be utilized in this study: the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method and the VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method. Both methods share a common goal of finding the closest value to the ideal solution, but they differ in their normalization and aggregation functions. TOPSIS calculates the criteria weight values first, followed by the criteria values, whereas VIKOR starts with the highest criteria values and then calculates the criteria weights. The results of this research indicate that some alternatives received the same ranking using TOPSIS and VIKOR methods. The criteria used to calculate data for Waste Banks are Operational Hours, Operational Schedule, Total Customers, Total Employees, and Amount of Collected Waste. These criteria are determined based on Regulation Minister of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2021 concerning Waste Management at Waste Banks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
I. N. Syahbiba, Studi Kriteria Perencanaan Bank Sampah Melalui Aplikasi Berbasis Android. 2017.
M. Selomo, A. B. Birawida, A. Mallongi, and M. Muammar, “Bank Sampah Sebagai Salah Satu Solusi Penanganan Sampah Di Kota Makassar,” Media Kesehat. Masy. Indones., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 232–240, 2017, doi: 10.30597/mkmi.v12i4.1543.
D. K. dan Informatika, Profil Kota Makasar. 2021.
Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup, “Sistem Informasi Manajemen Bank Sampah (SIMBA).” https://simba.menlhk.go.id/portal/
A. J. Fiermanzah, Muhammad Syafar, Andi Yusuf, “PERILAKU MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PEMANFAATAN BANK SAMPAH DI KELURAHAN KAPASA RAYA KOTA MAKASSAR,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 364–372, 2021.
N. A. U. N. Muljadi, W. Widekso, and W. T. Atmojo, “Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan TOPSIS dengan VIKOR dalam Pemilihan Hubungan Kerjasama,” Techno.Com, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 224–236, 2022, doi: 10.33633/tc.v21i2.5889.
A. Pratama, R. M. Kurnia, and V. Ilhadi, “Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Kualitas Biji Kopi Ekspor Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan VIKOR (Studi Kasus : Biji Kopi Ekspor Pada Tiap Koperasi),” J. Ilm. SINUS, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 1, 2023, doi: 10.30646/sinus.v21i2.689.
S. Bansal, “S . Bansal , M . Chhimwal A . Jayant ( 2015 ) ‘ A Comprehensive VIKOR and TOPSIS Method For Supplier Selection In Supply Chain Management : A Case Study ’ Journal of Material Science and Me ... TRACK 1 : Mechanical Engineering A COMPREHENSIVE VIKOR AND TO,” no. November, 2015.
H. Jati, “Comparison of University Webometrics Ranking Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: TOPSIS and VIKOR Method,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 71, pp. 1663–1669, 2012, [Online]. Available: www.harvard.edu
S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
A. Shekhovtsov and W. Salabun, “A comparative case study of the VIKOR and TOPSIS rankings similarity,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 3730–3740, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.014.
A. Chauhan and R. Vaish, “A Comparative Study on Decision Making Methods with Interval Data,” J. Comput. Eng., vol. 2014, pp. 1–10, 2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/793074.
E. Cevikcan, S. Cebi, and I. Kaya, “Fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy axiomatic design versus to fuzzy TOPSIS: An application of candidate assessment,” J. Mult. Log. Soft Comput., vol. 15, no. 2–3, pp. 181–208, 2009.
A. Ramadhani, R. Santoso2, and R. Rahmawati, “PEMILIHAN PERUMAHAN TERFAVORIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE VIKOR DAN TOPSIS DENGAN GUI MATLAB (Studi Kasus: Perumahan Mijen Semarang),” J. Gaussian, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 330–342, 2019, doi: 10.14710/j.gauss.v8i3.26678.
Titin Kristiana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS Untuk Pemilihan Lokasi Pendirian Grosir Pulsa,” Paradigma, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://repository.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/unduh/item/235936/2908-9372-1-PB.pdf
H. S. Shih, H. J. Shyur, and E. S. Lee, “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making,” Math. Comput. Model., vol. 45, no. 7–8, pp. 801–813, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023.
R. Rahim et al., “TOPSIS Method Application for Decision Support System in Internal Control for Selecting Best Employees,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012052.
V. Number, “Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence,” vol. 2, no. 1, p. 6333, 2016.
M. W. P. Agatmadja and A. Suri, “Penerapan Metode Vikor Dalam Pemilihan Calon Peserta Olimpiade Olahraga Siswa Nasional ( O2SN ),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2018.
D. Siregar et al., “Multi-Attribute Decision Making with VIKOR Method for Any Purpose Decision,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1019, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1019/1/012034.
Raihan et al., “Metode Penelitian,” Kementeri. Kesehat. Republik Indones., vol. 59, no. April, p. 150, 2015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v13i2.2158
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed By:
