Students' Intentions to Use E-Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Extended Technological Accaptance Model (TAM) Approach
(1) Program studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan BIsnis Universitas muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Online learning is a technology-based system, hence a process is required to ensure that students can embarace the technology, as the success or failure of a technology is determined by how well the user accepts it. Therefore, understanding the factors that drive the use of online learning is essential. This study aims to contribute to the literature on online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 epidemic by investigating the relationship between self-awareness and student acceptance of online learning. Several hypotheses were constructed using the TAM Model to investigate the relationship between the TAM construct and self-awareness as an antecedent. This study employed structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) to investigate how 390 students in East Jakarta used online learning. The findings of this study revealed that self-awareness had a significant effect on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude, but it had no direct impact on the intention to continue using e-learning. Students' attitudes were considerably influenced by perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Perceived usefulness was the most influential factor on student attitudes, and attitude was a strong predictor of intention to continue utilizing online learning. The proposed model accurately predicted attitudes and intentions to continue to use e-learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
T. Farahat, “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Online Learning in the Egyptian Universities,” vol. 64, pp. 95–104, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012.
R. George Saadé and D. Kira, “The Emotional State of Technology Acceptance,” Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. January 2019, pp. 529–539, 2006, doi: 10.28945/913.
S. Y. Park, An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding University students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning, vol. 12, no. 3. 2009.
C. H.-L. L. C.-J. P. Su-Houn Liu, “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online Consumer Behavior,” Issue Inf. Syst. Res., vol. VI, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 2005, doi: 10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83.
M. S. Cole, H. S. Feild, and S. G. Harris, “Student Learning Motivation and Psychological Hardiness: Interactive Effects on Students’ Reactions to a Management Class,” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 64–85, 2004, doi: 10.5465/amle.2004.12436819.
S. Duval and R. A. Wicklund, “Effects of objective self-awareness on attribution of causality,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 1973, doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90059-0.
Y. Yao, P. Wang, Y. Jiang, Q. Li, and Y. Li, “Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 100252, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252.
F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, no. 3. pp. 475–487, 1993, doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
E. K. and D. W. S. David Gefen, “TRUST AND TAM IN ONLINE SHOPPING: AN INTEGRATED MODEL,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–90, 2003, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0.
H. Baber, “Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 100503, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503.
F. Baji, F. Azadeh, Z. Sabaghinejad, and A. Zalpour, “Determinants of e-learning acceptance amongst Iranian postgraduate students,” J. Glob. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2022, doi: 10.5038/2577-509x.6.2.1089.
S. A. Salloum, A. Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. Abdel Monem, and K. Shaalan, “Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128445–128462, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
S. E. Atmojo, T. Muhtarom, and B. D. Lukitoaji, “The level of self-regulated learning and self-awareness in science learning in the covid-19 pandemic era,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 512–520, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25544.
T. W. Ismoyowati, “Studi Korelasi Self Awareness dengan Tingkat Pemahaman Materi Kuliah Selama Pembelajaran Daring dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19 pada Mahasiswa STIKes Bethesda Yakkum Yogyakarta,” Penelit. Kesehat. Suara Forikes, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 303–305, 2021.
V. Singh and A. Thurman, “How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018),” Am. J. Distance Educ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 289–306, 2019, doi: 10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082.
V. Chang, “Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 476–485, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.007.
S. Mohammadyari and H. Singh, “Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy,” Comput. Educ., vol. 82, pp. 11–25, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025.
R. Chandwani, R. De, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Telemedicine for low resource settings: Exploring the generative mechanisms,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 127, no. June, pp. 177–187, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.014.
R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?,” Decis. Sci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 361–391, 1999, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x.
V. Venkatesh, “Creation of Favorable User Perception: Exploring The Role Of Intrinsic Motivation,” vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 239–260, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249753.
M. J. Alsamydai, “Adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to the Use of Mobile Banking Services,” Int. Rev. Manag. Bus. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2016–2028, 2014.
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test,” Decis. Sci., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 451–481, 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.
R. A. Wicklund, “Objective Self-Awareness,” Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. Vol. 8, vol. 8, pp. 233–275, 1975.
T. S. Duval and P. J. Silvia, “Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2002, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.49.
P. J. Silvia and T. S. Duval, “Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 230–241, 2001, doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_4.
Michael F Scheier; Charles S.Carver, “The Self Conciousness:A Revised Version For Use With General Populations,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 687–699, 1985.
S. Fischer, S. Gauggel, and L. E. Trexler, “Awareness of activity limitations, goal setting and rehabilitation outcome in patients with brain injuries,” Brain Inj., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 547–562, 2004, doi: 10.1080/02699050310001645793.
D. N. Rachmah, R. Perdana, and ..., “Self Awareness As A Mediator For Self-Directed Learning And Goal Setting On Students,” Turkish J. …, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 9049–9060, 2021.
C. J. Travers, D. Morisano, and E. A. Locke, “Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: A qualitative study,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 224–241, 2015, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12059.
D. R. Garrison, “Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 18–33, 1997, doi: 10.1177/074171369704800103.
K. S. Rhee, “Self-directed learning: To be aware or not to be aware,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 568–589, 2003, doi: 10.1177/1052562903252653.
D. Scott Ridley, P. A. Schutz, R. S. Glanz, and C. E. Weinstein, “Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 293–306, 1992, doi: 10.1080/00220973.1992.9943867.
M. S. Taat and A. Francis, “Factors influencing the students’ acceptance of e-learning at teacher education institute: An exploratory study in Malaysia,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2020, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p133.
F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
I. Ajzen and T. J. Madden, “Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 453–474, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.
T. M. Ostrom, “The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–30, 1969, doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1.
H. C. Triandis, “Subjective Culture and Interpersonal Relations Across Cultures,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 418–434, 1977, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb29370.x.
Viswanath Venkatesh Michael G. Moris and Gordon B. Davis Carlson, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1689–1699, 2003, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
A. Azam, “Continuance intention model for mobile banking,” Int. J. Electron. Financ., vol. 8, no. 2–4, pp. 169–188, 2015, doi: 10.1504/IJEF.2015.070534.
M. Saparudin, “Consumers ’ Continuance Intention Use of Mobile Banking in Jakarta : Extending UTAUT Models with Trust,” in 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech 2020), 2020, no. August, pp. 50–54.
M. Saparudin, A. Rahayu, R. Hurriyati, and M. Adib Sultan, “The influence of trust, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease upon customers’ attitude and intention toward the use of mobile banking in Jakarta,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 3584–3594, 2020.
T. C. Lin and C. J. Chen, “Validating the satisfaction and continuance intention of e-learning systems: Combining tam and is success models,” Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2012, doi: 10.4018/jdet.2012010103.
M. Saparudin, A. Rahayu, R. Hurriyati, M. A. Sultan, and A. M. Ramdan, “Consumers’ continuance intention use of mobile banking in jakarta: Extending UTAUT models with trust,” Proc. 2020 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2020, no. August, pp. 50–54, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211188.
F. Abdullah and R. Ward, “Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 56, pp. 238–256, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036.
E. W. L. Cheng, “Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM),” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6.
S. Sharma and J. Chandel, “Technology Acceptance Model for the use of learning through websites among students in Oman,” Int. Arab J. e-Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2013.
S. A. Raza, A. Umer, and N. Shah, “New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption,” Int. J. Electron. Cust. Relatsh. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 44–65, 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJECRM.2017.086751.
A. W. Siyal, D. Donghong, W. A. Umrani, S. Siyal, and S. Bhand, “Predicting Mobile Banking Acceptance and Loyalty in Chinese Bank Customers,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019844084.
J. H. Al-Ammary, A. K. Al-Sherooqi, and H. K. Al-Sherooqi, “The Acceptance of Social Networking as a Learning Tools at University of Bahrain,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 208–214, 2014, doi: 10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.400.
W. M. Al-Rahmi et al., “Use of E-Learning by University Students in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions: A Case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14268–14276, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2802325.
C. C. Chang, C. F. Yan, and J. S. Tseng, “Perceived Convenience in an extended technology acceptance model,” Mob. Technol. English Learn. Coll. students, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 809–826, 2012.
C. Y. Chiang, K. Boakye, and X. Tang, “The Investigation of E-Learning System Design Quality on Usage Intention,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2019, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2017.1342176.
C. C. Chang, S. W. Hung, M. J. Cheng, and C. Y. Wu, “Exploring the intention to continue using social networking sites: The case of Facebook,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 95, pp. 48–56, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.012.
A. Padilla-Meléndez, A. R. Del Aguila-Obra, and A. Garrido-Moreno, “Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario,” Comput. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 306–317, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014.
M. Mailizar, D. Burg, and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7057–7077, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5.
A. W. Siyal, D. Donghong, W. A. Umrani, S. Siyal, and S. Bhand, “Predicting Mobile Banking Acceptance and Loyalty in Chinese Bank Customers,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 2, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019844084.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v13i1.2014
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed By:
